Obamney total war
Kick ass mod
If you ever feel like you’ve screwed up, just remember that in 1348 the Scots thought it would be a good idea to invade England because the English were weakened by the Plague. They subsequently caught the plague themselves, went back to Scotland, and killed half their own population.
This is beautiful.
… with different degrees of struggles that we’re implemented by the pale skin via conquests using weapons such as warfare, religion indoctrination, and oppression. And then after pale skin set systems like this into our society, they go around and say things like “We are all human” and confuse “racism” with “prejudice” so that they can keep the system the same way for many years to come.
More like you morons completely forget your ancestors did the same damn shit and then try to change the definition of words to exempt yourself from criticism.
Yes because PoC have set up a system where People of Color have ~poc privilege~, don’t confuse “racism” and “prejudice”.
Actually yes they have.
Mayans and Aztecs weren’t carving people’s hearts outs of their chests for the gods.
The Mongols killing at least 30,000,000 people?
Along with Mao and his death toll
Armenian genocide at the hands of the Turkish?
Japanese Empire raping, killing, and looting all over the Pacific?
Native Americans being tribes of warrior societies who constantly fought each other?
Iroquois tribes being imperialistic land grabbing machines of brutality?
Yuan-Ming dynasty transition?
Qing conquering of the Ming dynasty?
An Lushan Rebellion? .
Somalian Civil War?
Nigerian Civil War?
Nairobi Mall attack?
Don’t forget that other countries besides America exist, and damn sure don’t change the definition of fucking words, you dumb cunt.
Well look at that.
The weirdest thing about all of this stuff is they seem to think prejudice is fine. Diet racism. Racism lite. Skim racism.
This is how racist Tumblr is.
Not only do they have such an Americanized view of history and the world but they apply it to everything, where the world thing ever in the world was the white people claiming First Nation’s land and enslaving Africans (and yes, those are awful things, but other nations have done similar).
Not only that, they act like if you aren’t white, you were fucking helpless little lambs for all of history, incapable of evil, brutality or violence. They’re treating entire ethnic groups like children, free of responsibility because of their skin color. Only white people are apparently ‘worthy’ enough respect to be judged by their actions.
Today I leaned “PoC” don’t even have “privilege” or whatever you want to call it in nations they founded themselves where they are the overwhelming majority.
White privilege applies in Japan? Try leaving the house once in a while you uneducated shit-for-brains shut-ins.
Once again, there is no reason to think of racism or sexism as “power + prejudice.” That usage is unique to the field of sociology, in which the “power plus prejudice” crap is a technical term. It’s not a common definition, and moreover it’s not a technical term in all academic disciplines. Psychology is perfectly at home equating racism and sexism with pure prejudice. Also, sociology is among the most intellectually dishonest fields in contemporary academia (see: here & here).
There is, simply put, no good reason for anyone to use “racism” to mean a system, rather than using the adjectival form of “racism” to apply to the system, as in “racist system.” If sociologists find it convenient to use “racism” to describe a system, that is because sociology - apart from being the softest of the soft sciences - deals in behavior of large groups, which means the “discrimination” part of the definition of racism is what matters to them. Consequently, they emphasize the behavioral manifestations rather than the more subjective or cognitive or individual facets.
But unless you’re prepared to argue some kind of radical behaviorist or utilitarian or otherwise anti-mentalist philosophy, there is no reason to adapt the technical term for common use. The only reason strong enough to make a movement attempt to do that would be if it were congenial to their purposes. That is, if redefining the word served their ends. And, of course, it does. You don’t have to be a cynic to see how defining racism so that, no matter what, non-white people cannot be in any way responsible for it serves the end of this particular special interest. Serves them, I might add, at the expense of nuance or correspondence to reality.
In sum, people who want to tell you that “racism = power + prejudice” are really just trying to frame the terms of the debate, move the goalposts a little, and specially plead for their control of the discourse.
It’s kind of sad, actually.
I’m still stuck on that “Native Americans being tribes of warrior societies who constantly fought each other? ” Like excuse you fuck right off I am ‘Native American’ you don’t even fucking KNOW OUR HISTORY IN ANY MEANINGFUL WAY.
"Iroquois tribes being imperialistic land grabbing machines of brutality?"
Where’s this bitch so I can cut him/her/it.
You know the Mayans, Aztecs, and Incas, all famous for war-like tendecies, were native american “tribes” (though civilizations seems more accurate to me).
Also, the Iroquois league formed because the tribes were sick of fighting over land and killing each other, and became one big land grabbing imperial confederacy.
IM GOING TO STAB MYSELF IN THE FOOT I JUST SENT MY ENGLISH TEACHER MY ESSAY ON HAMLET AND IT WAS STILL NAMED “the fresh prince of denmark yo holla”
oh man, i love receiving unedited final drafts:
cracks me up every time